
A shot of the article, on the printed page, complete with my own underlinings and marginalia, and shadows cast by the setting sun.
The July/August issue of Print Magazine features an article which aroused my fellow subway riders’ interest in me as I tore the top, folded edges of the pages in order to unseal them (I admit to thinking, what the…? Till I got the point), the way one used to be obliged to do with fresh-off-the-press hardcover books in the old days. Ripping away, it was at least a kind of attention that didn’t involve my legs or cleavage, so I appreciated the refreshing difference. (It was fun to be the crazy lady ripping up her magazine, an impression which can prove not disadvantageous on a New York subway.)
UPDATE: it turns out I had one of a few rogue issues whose pages had anomolously not been split at the top, with the unintentional effect of adding even more authenticity to the “bound book” effect, so don’t be disappointed if yours isn’t like mine!
The piece, called, “Bound for Glory,” by Mark Dery, and photographed by Michael Heiko, is about the transition from bound, printed books to the digital image. Its presentation, once you gently break the pages open (a bit like a deflowering), is a virtual book. The image of a book was printed on the magazine’s pages, from the book’s bound cover to the text of the article printed within the “book”’s pages, which succeeded in looking very three-dimentional. Have a look below:

I remember watching Ray Bradbury’s “Martian Chronicles” on TV as a child (in 1979), and being fascinated by the digital books it foretold. I’m sure I saw the prototype of the Palm Pilot (or at least of the electronic book) in one episode, a dark, smooth tablet of about the same dimensions as an iPod, as I recall it. And for a while, in the spirit of it all, as soon as I learned of their existence, I did own a Palm Pilot into which I downloaded whatever decent digital books were available, and read them on the metro on my way to work. It wasn’t as easy as I’d hoped (particularly tough on my LED, grey and black display!). But still, it was better than nothing on an airplane, particularly when a few “real” books would have weighed further upon my shoulders in a backpack than a bit of plastic enclosing some circuitry and two AAA batteries.
I’m still on the fence. I love the idea of an entire library in a doodad as small as a bar of Côte d’Or chocolate (smaller!). But I will also never forget the experience of reading medieval manuscripts in the Bibiliothèque Nationale in Paris, and discovering red candle droppings on the pages, leading me to wonder who had been reading them before electricity came to the BN. Rousseau? Diderot? I was sharing these texts with not only the original author, but also the scribe of the manuscript (or in the case of some ancient books, the earliest typesetters), as well as the many readers whose hands had touched them over the centuries. A germophobe’s nightmare, perhaps! But a researcher’s dream.
Here’s an example of what you can’t get from notes typed into Filemaker Pro as I eventually did during my doctoral studies: notes.
And here’s a virtual panoramic tour of the gracious old (not the new) BN, where I had the privilege of studying all those old books and manuscripts. (You might want to turn your sound off first, if you don’t want to hear the French guy talking about it).
Other pieces of great interest to me personally in the July/August issue of Print:
- “Agitprop Primers” (about children’s books and illustration styles thereof during the Cold War, just beautiful) by Steven Heller.
- “Acrobat Reader”, by Anna Gerber & Teal Triggs, (about the visual possibilities of typeface and the printed page from the surprisingly ornate Tristram Shandy, to Perec’s famous “e”-less “A Void,” to Rick Moody’s The Diviners and Jonathan Safrans Foer’s particularly transgressive use of typeface in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close.”
- Emily Gordon’s Another Round, which brings us a meeting of the minds of Milton Glaser (I “heart” NY), and Stephen Hindy (of Brooklyn Ale fame), the result of which is naturally in the kind of good taste that both your taste buds and mind-buds can appreciate.